Sign In
APEC Project Database

Project Title

Technical Barriers to Trade: Recent Trends in Regional FTAs

Project Year

2023

Project Number

SCSC_204_2023A

Project Session

Session 2

Project Type

Standard

Project Status

Completed Project

Project No.

SCSC_204_2023A

Project Title

*
Technical Barriers to Trade: Recent Trends in Regional FTAs

Project Status

Completed Project

Fund Account

*
APEC Support Fund

Sub-fund

ASF: General Fund

Project Year

2023

Project Session

*
Session 2

APEC Funding

113,650

Co-funding Amount

0

Total Project Value

113,650

Sponsoring Forum

*
Sub-Committee on Standards and Conformance (SCSC)

Topics

Conformance; Standards and Conformance

Committee

Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI)

Other Fora Involved

Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved

 

Proposing Economy(ies)

United States

Co-Sponsoring Economies

Australia; Canada; Chile; Japan; Malaysia; Mexico; New Zealand; Peru; Philippines; Singapore; Chinese Taipei; Thailand; Viet Nam

Expected Start Date

01/03/2024

Expected Completion Date

31/12/2024

Project Proponent Name 1

Kent Shigetomi

Job Title 1

Director, Multilateral Non-Tariff Barriers

Organization 1

Office of the US Trade Representative

Telephone 1

(1-202) 3959459

Email 1

Project Proponent Name 2

Not Applicable

Job Title 2

Not Applicable

Organization 2

Not Applicable

Telephone 2

Not Applicable

Email 2

Not Applicable

Declaration

Kent Shigetomi

Project Summary

As successive trade liberalization has led to a general decline in tariffs, the importance of non-tariff measures such as technical regulations has grown. The WTO has seen a growth in the number of specific trade concerns raised in the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. In 2022, approximately 240 issues were raised in committee meetings and over 50 disputes have cited inconsistency with the WTO TBT Agreement. Many economies have used the WTO TBT Agreement as a basis for TBT chapters in bilateral or regional FTAs. It is important to understand how they have built on the TBT Agreement. The project will study FTAs to see how they treat TBT and will organize a conference to discuss findings. The conference will focus on the most commonly cited problem areas with TBT implementation. The project will also address strategies to strengthen coordination between trade and regulatory officials.

Relevance

Region:

Implementation of the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) remains a priority for APEC economies. Within the WTO TBT Committee, consideration of specific trade concerns (STC), or issues that one WTO member has with the regulatory measures of another member, have grown each year. In 1995, the WTO received 365 notifications under the TBT Agreement; by 2021, that figure had grown more than tenfold to 3,966. Implementation of the TBT Agreement has led to disputes, as well. Fifty-seven WTO disputes have cited the TBT Agreement in the request for consultations.

APEC economies recognize that their standards, technical regulations, and conformity assessment procedures remain a priority. In the 2020 RAASR Individual Action Plans, more economies cited regulatory improvement as an area for work than any other issue. Twelve APEC economies are pursuing work to improve regulatory quality, apply regulatory impact analysis, to apply good regulatory practices (GRP), and to analyze the very structure of their regulatory process. Thus, APEC must continue disseminating information on the benefits of high-level support for regulatory reform, especially when non-tariff barriers to trade and restrictions to investment became the forefront of market access issues.

Regulatory quality has a direct effect on trade. Research has shown that when standards-related measures are outdated, overly burdensome, discriminatory, or otherwise inappropriate, these measures can reduce competition, stifle innovation, and create unnecessary technical barriers to trade. These kinds of measures can pose a particular problem for small and medium enterprises, which often do not have the resources to address these problems on their own.

Eligibility and Fund Priorities:

This concept note seeks funding from the APEC Support Fund – General Fund. The project aims to improve implementation of the WTO TBT Agreement and regulatory quality in all economies—particularly developing economies.

Developing Human Capital: The project will boost trade officials’ knowledge of and familiarity with both the WTO TBT Agreement and other economies’ FTA chapters. This will contribute to higher quality technical regulations and greater consistency with international obligations. Innovative obligations can be incorporated into new FTAs.

Integration into the Global Economy: WTO-inconsistent technical regulations have the ability to cut off an economies from the rest of the global economy by imposing requirements that others, including APEC economies, are unable to fulfill. This project seeks to reduce trade barriers and boost overall trade.

Addressing Social Dimension of Globalization: Globalization is the process by which goods, services, knowledge, and ideas spread around the world. The convergence of economies promotes interaction and integration. In some cases, however, local factors may hinder globalization by creating barriers to trade. This project seeks to reduce technical barriers to trade by promoting the implementation of the TBT Agreement.

Capacity Building:

This project is intended to strengthen the ability of negotiators and regulators in all economies—and particularly those in developing economies—to understand and adhere to the obligations in the TBT Agreement. In the 2020 RAASR survey, 12 economies.

identified aspects of regulatory improvement as a priority. Nine of these 12 were developing economies.   By enhancing the ability of negotiators and regulators to understand and apply the TBT Agreement, economies will be able to produce higher quality regulations that fulfil legitimate public policy objectives, while not creating unnecessary barriers to trade.

The TBT Agreement contains rules that help ensure that standards-related measures serve legitimate objectives, are transparent, and do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade. If implementation can be improved, we should see fewer trade disputes and increased trade between economies. Regulations that have been developed consistently with the TBT Agreement will have greater stakeholder acceptance because more parties were given an opportunity to consider the measure and submit comments. Implementing the measure will be easier because operational problems will have already been identified and addressed.  If international (rather than economy-specific standards were used in the technical regulation, then it will be easier for all economies to produce goods that are consistent with the standard. This increased trade would lead to greater prosperity and lower costs.

Objectives

The objective of this project is twofold: to improve implementation of the WTO TBT Agreement and understand how FTA TBT chapters build on the WTO TBT Agreement. This will help to reduce the number of TBT-related trade issues and help economies in future FTA negotiations. The project aims to accomplish this through a study of TBT chapters in economies’ FTAs and a workshop that brings together trade negotiators, regulators, outside stakeholders, and representatives of outside organizations. The project will seek to share information about methods to improve implementation of the Agreement by using case studies of individual economies’ strategies.

Alignment

APEC:
Regulatory quality has deep roots within APEC. Section C.2 of the Osaka Action Agenda calls on economies to “ensur[e] the transparency of APEC economies' respective non-tariff measures.” APEC has long realized the important role of regulatory quality. The Putrajaya Vision 2040 calls for work to create a “transparent and predictable trade and investment environment” through “support for agreed upon rules of the WTO.” The Aotearoa Plan of Action includes commitments to “promote macro-economic policies... that promot[e] good regulatory practices and regulatory cooperation.” To pursue structural reform, economies have agreed to work in these two areas. Thailand’s priority to remain “open to all opportunities” envisions work to adapt and strengthen “domestic policies and institutions..., including economic and legal infrastructure, regulatory practices, as well as public sector and corporate governance.”

Forum:
The SCSC is focused on reducing trade barriers that may arise because of technical regulations. The first objective listed in the SCSC’s terms of reference is “endeavour to reduce technical barriers to trade and enhance market access through standards and conformance.” The objectives also include work to “ensure greater transparency” and “promote and encourage participation in standards education and awareness programs to build capacity and capability.”

Beneficiaries and Outputs

Output 1: Pre-Workshop Questionnaire
The main purpose of the project is to educate officials on how TBT chapters in bilateral or multilateral agreements build on or differ from the WTO TBT Agreement, and to understand why. In order to understand this, we will circulate a pre-workshop questionnaire to ensure that we cover all relevant agreements and identify areas of interest to economies. Key findings from the questionnaire will shape the individual panels and topics discussed. The results of the questionnaire will be shared at the workshop and SCSC meeting.

Output 2 - Workshop

The focus of the project is to organize and stage a two-day, in-person workshop in the United States in mid-2024. In order to maximize participation, we will investigate the cost of adding a remote connection option if there is interest and the cost can be covered by the project.

However, depending on the administrative expenses associated with a standalone meeting, the venue may shift to SOM 3 in Peru or SOM 1 in Korea to reduce expenses and increase participation. Prior to the workshop, the project overseer will conduct an analysis of TBT chapters in the FTAs negotiated by APEC economies to determine how such chapters differ from the WTO TBT Agreement. The analysis will highlight the obligations that go beyond the WTO TBT Agreement and what they seek to accomplish. The workshop will also examine ways to strengthen cooperation between regulatory officials (who develop measures) and trade officials (who respond to questions and challenges in the WTO). Finally, depending on the results of the analysis, the workshop may examine WTO TBT jurisprudence.

Gender considerations will be integrated into the project. For example, when comparing TBT chapters in different agreements, we will seek to identify measures that relate to gender or may have an impact on gender differences. Any information that economies have related to the relationship between TBT-related issues and gender will be identified.

Prior to the conclusion of the workshop, the key findings will be summarized and shared, and participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire. This questionnaire will seek to identify the parts of the workshop that were least and most helpful, as well as identify areas for future work. The findings will be shared with the SCSC and included in project reporting.

Output 3 - Project Summary Report

An electronic report (4-6 pages) will be available to all economies at the end of the workshop. It will contain the agenda, materials/presentations and curricula vitae of speakers. It will summarize the presentations in order to help interested officials who were unable to attend the workshop. These materials will be e-mailed to participants and will be made available on the APEC website. It is intended to serve as a written summary of the event, not as an APEC publication.

Recommendations for future work will be prepared as part of the report guided by the discussions/results of the workshop. The project overseer will also survey and compile feedback from participants, especially input related to possible areas for future capacity-building activities.

Outcomes
1) The key outcome of this project is the enhanced ability of trade officials to understand the TBT-related obligations in recent trade agreements and how they function. Based on this analysis, they may seek to incorporate similar measures in their own negotiations. Regulators will be able to better understand their obligations in the TBT Agreement and FTA TBT chapters. By doing so, they will be able to develop standards, technical regulations, and conformity assessment procedures that achieve the intended public policy outcomes, while not erecting unnecessary barriers to trade. This, in turn, should lead to expanded trade between APEC economies, since there will be fewer barriers to trade.

2) Information on WTO and FTA jurisprudence will enhance regulators’ understanding of how their actions can affect international trade and what any WTO-related effects might be.

Beneficiaries

The root of many TBT problems is the disconnect between regulators and TBT experts. The WTO TBT Agreement requires each member to have an enquiry point to serve as conduit between the member and the WTO. The enquiry point transmits pending regulations to the WTO to allow other members to submit comments. In many WTO members, the enquiry point is the national standards organization. Regulators, on the other hand, are focused on developing rules to achieve a specific public policy goal. They may not always be aware of the WTO rules that affect their work, such as providing an opportunity for comments, national treatment or the use of international standards.

The target participants for this project will primarily be negotiators and regulators in APEC economies. However, since the quality of regulations is enhanced by transparency and broad opportunities for public comment, we intend to invite other government officials (e.g., trade), the private sector, and NGOs.

Women will actively participate in the planning, management, allocation of resources, and implementation of the project and will play key roles in planning the conference. The project overseer will actively encourage the participation of women in the conference, including as presenters at the conference.  The project seeks to have women represent at least 50 per cent of the workshop participants and speakers.

Within economies, the following groups of participants are likely to benefit the most:

Trade Negotiators and Regulators: This workshop is intended to enhance expertise with the TBT Agreement, so trade negotiators of TBT chapters and government regulators are the ideal participants. We will use the WTO TBT Agreement as the starting point of discussion, so officials from government agencies should have a basic understanding of the rule-making procedures in their economy and the TBT Agreement.

Private Sector and Civil Society: Trade policy should be developed through a process that provides for meaningful consultation with the public. As a result, representatives of organizations that regularly review and provide input on trade negotiations are ideal participants. Former trade negotiators may also be able to provide their perspective on past negotiations.

Representatives of international organizations: Other multilateral organizations have conducted important work on the application of the TBT Agreement. An official from the WTO Secretariat would be an obvious speaker. Representatives of Other APEC Groups: The application of the TBT Agreement has been discussed in other APEC groups. The Economic Committee has a responsibility with the SCSC to organize the annual conference on GRP and has conducted GRP work on its own. Peru recently analyzed WTO TBT and SPS notifications for the CTI, so that committee is likely to be interested in this work.

Dissemination

We will produce a project summary report that will be submitted to the APEC Secretariat for distribution to the SCSC. The project summary will also be presented in PowerPoint form to the SCSC at its next in-person meeting. No video or audio summary or compilation are planned.

These materials will be e-mailed to participants and will be made available on the APEC website.  they are intended to serve as a written summary of the event, not as an APEC publications.  they will be submitted for inclusion in the MDDB.  The results of the pre-workshop survey will be included in the final project summary report and also shared with the SCSC.  The survey results will primarily be used to shape the workshop agenda by identifying sectors of interest.

Gender

Please see the Project Proposal posted in Supporting Document folder.

Work Plan

Please see the Project Proposal posted in Supporting Document folder.

Risks

Please see the Project Proposal posted in Supporting Document folder.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Please see the Project Proposal posted in Supporting Document folder.

Linkages

Trade Negotiators and Regulators: This workshop is intended to enhance expertise with the TBT Agreement, so trade negotiators of TBT chapters and government regulators are the ideal participants. We will use the WTO TBT Agreement as the starting point of discussion, so officials from government agencies should have a basic understanding of the rulemaking procedures in their economy and the TBT Agreement.

Private Sector and Civil Society: Trade policy should be developed through a process that provides for meaningful consultation with the public. As a result, representatives of organizations that regularly review and provide input on trade negotiations are ideal participants. Former trade negotiators may also be able to provide their perspective on past negotiations.

Representatives of international organizations: Other multilateral organizations have conducted important work on the application of the TBT Agreement. An official from the WTO Secretariat would be an obvious speaker.

Representatives of Other APEC Groups: The application of the TBT Agreement has been discussed in other APEC groups. The Economic Committee has responsibility with the SCSC to organize the annual conference on GRP and has conducted GRP work on its own. Peru recently conducted an analysis of WTO TBT and SPS notifications for the CTI, so that committee is likely to be interested in this work.

Sustainability

The WTO TBT Agreement establishes rules on developing, adopting, and applying voluntary product standards and mandatory technical regulations as well as conformity assessment procedures (such as testing or certification) used to determine whether a particular product meets such standards or regulations. However, this agreement was negotiated nearly 30 years ago, and much has changed since then. Individual economies have developed standalone TBT chapters in their FTAs. It would be helpful to see how these chapters have evolved, and what new obligations have been included.  These findings will allow economies to learn from each other.  The workshop conclusions will be presented to the SCSC, cTI, and Economic Committee.  The results will be shared with the WTO Secretariat to determine if a presentation to the WTO TBT Committee is warranted.


Direct Labour

Not Applicable.

Are there any supporting document attached?

Yes
Project No.
Project Title
Project Status
Fund Account
Sub-fund
Project Year
Project Session
APEC Funding
Co-funding Amount
Total Project Value
Sponsoring Forum
Topics
Committee
Other Fora Involved
Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved
Proposing Economy(ies)
Co-Sponsoring Economies
Expected Start Date
Expected Completion Date
Project Proponent Name 1
Job Title 1
Organization 1
Telephone 1
Email 1
Project Proponent Name 2
Job Title 2
Organization 2
Telephone 2
Email 2
Declaration
Project Summary
Relevance
Objectives
Alignment
Beneficiaries and Outputs
Dissemination
Gender
Work Plan
Risks
Monitoring and Evaluation
Linkages
Sustainability
Direct Labour
Are there any supporting document attached?
hdFldAdmin
Project Number
Previous Fora
Secretariat Comments
Reprogramming Notes
Consolidated QAF
Endorsement By Fora
PD Sign Off
Batch
Forum Priority
Committee Ranking Category
Committee Priority
PDM Priority
Priority Within Funding Category
Monitoring Report Received
Completion Report Received
PMU Field 1
PMU Field 2
PMU Field 3
On Behalf Of
Proposal Status
Originating Sub-Forum
Approval Status
Attachments
Content Type: Standard Proposal